Skip to main content

Application for Anticipatory Bail

IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT AND SESSIONS
___________________ COURTS, _______.

IN THE MATTER OF:
_______________(Name of accused)
vs.
STATE

FIR No._______
u/s ________
P.S. ___________________

INDEX
Sno
Particulars
Pages
1
Application for Anticipatory bail of _________ u/s 438 CR.P.C.

2
Annexure-1 :Order of learned MM taking cognisance of the offence.

3
Annexure-2 :Copy of FIR

4
Annexure 3:Copy of Interim Report filed by the police.

5
Annexure 4 :Copy of the final report and charge sheet filed by the police.



Date:                                                                            Accused
Place: Delhi                                                    through
                                                                                     Advocate


IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT AND SESSIONS
___________COURTS, _______.

IN THE MATTER OF:
____________

vs.

STATE

FIR No.________
u/s __________
P.S. __________.

APPLICATION FOR GRANT OF ANTICIPATORY BAIL U/S 438 CR.P.C.

Most respectfully showeth:

1. That the accused is ______________________s/o____________
r/o_______________________________________.That the accused work for______________________________and is a respected member of society.

2. That the learned MM has taken cognisance of the offence against ______________and issued summons to the applicant vide order dated ______(Annexure 1 & 2).

3. That the applicant apprehends arrest on her date of appearance on ___________ in State vs._____________ and hence this application.

4. That there is no prima-facie case against _______________. That the facts of the case are_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

5. That thus there is no incidence of either Mens Rea or Actus Reus against the applicant thereby indicating the absence of any prima-facie case against the applicant.

6. That the FIR does not create a prima facie case against he applicant.

7. That there is no possibility of the accused_____________ absconding since she is a housewife and has to look after her two children.That her local address and that of her parents is known to the police.

8. That the applicant is in no way connected to the alleged offence u/s_____.

9. That the applicant is not required for any sort of investigation since the final investigation report and charge sheet have been filed by the police on 15.05.17.

10.That the applicant undertakes to present herself before the police/court as and when required.

11.That the applicant is not in any position to tamper with the evidence  because all the relevant evidence has already been consolidated in the final report by the police and the evidence is ______ in nature which is beyond the influence of the applicant.

12.That the applicant is ready and willing to accept any conditions imposed by the Hon’able court.


PRAYERS
It is therefore respectfully prayed to the Hon'ble Court that the applicant may kindly be granted Anticipatory bail.
For this act of kindness, the applicant shall be forever grateful.




Date:                                                                                     Accused
Place:                                                                          through

                                                                                               Advocate 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Supreme Court on Limitation

  The Supreme Court of India is hearing two appeals by a plaintiff, Ajay Dabra, who filed a suit for specific performance of a contract for the sale of agricultural land in Himachal Pradesh between the defendant and a company, which was dismissed by the District Judge and later by the High Court due to delay. The appeals challenge the High Court's decision to dismiss the delay condonation applications filed under the Limitation Act of 1963, which declined to condone a delay of 254 days as the reasons for the delay were not sufficient. The only reason provided by the plaintiff was a lack of funds to pay court fees, which the court found unsatisfactory as the plaintiff was an affluent businessman. The court cites section 149 of the Civil Procedure Code, which allows for the payment of court fees at a later stage, and emphasizes that the court fees act has to be read along with section 149 of the CPC. The Indian Supreme Court has emphasized the strict interpretation of Section 5 of th