Skip to main content

Supreme Court on false promise of marriage

 A


married woman had sexual relations with the accused, who promised to marry her. The courts initially found the accused guilty of the offense under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), but after a closer examination of the evidence, it was found to be a fallacy. The key issue is whether the woman's consent was given under a false promise or not. There is a difference between a false promise and a breach of promise, and the court must examine each case based on its specific facts. In this case, the woman was mature and intelligent enough to understand the consequences of her actions and her conduct during the relationship suggests that she had willingly betrayed her husband and children.

Every breach of promise is not a false promise of marriage and thus every breach of promise will not result in a conviction of rape.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Supreme Court on Limitation

  The Supreme Court of India is hearing two appeals by a plaintiff, Ajay Dabra, who filed a suit for specific performance of a contract for the sale of agricultural land in Himachal Pradesh between the defendant and a company, which was dismissed by the District Judge and later by the High Court due to delay. The appeals challenge the High Court's decision to dismiss the delay condonation applications filed under the Limitation Act of 1963, which declined to condone a delay of 254 days as the reasons for the delay were not sufficient. The only reason provided by the plaintiff was a lack of funds to pay court fees, which the court found unsatisfactory as the plaintiff was an affluent businessman. The court cites section 149 of the Civil Procedure Code, which allows for the payment of court fees at a later stage, and emphasizes that the court fees act has to be read along with section 149 of the CPC. The Indian Supreme Court has emphasized the strict interpretation of Section 5 of th
Post a Comment
Read more